The title of the writing indicates a ‘why’ and the expectation therefore is of reasons and that I intend to explain. However, I must clarify at the onset as to what heresy I have been accused of (i) that the antonym of not being a Christian or any other organised religion is to be an Atheist and that I am not (ii) to defy the teachings of Christ is to prep self to be casted in eternal flames and that is dystopian. I do not subscribe to either of this Dogmas, of Christian or Atheist but I hold myself to be a complete being. Since a thing cannot create itself from nothing, I am a complete ‘Art’ and that Artisan I call ‘God/ASIS[1]’ .
Why then to I stand outside yet I subscribe to ASIS? My divorce from the Christian Dogma rest fundamentally in the MEANS. The means here implies a process through which we arrive at a certain end and in this case HEAVEN. This is the place I hallucinated so much about when I was young, closing my eyes and Imagining a place right above the ceiling with a beautiful garden and a place plenty of honey and milk. Having Faith, believing in God and understanding the Bible in theological sense is the surest way of reaping the fruits of heaven. These in my own view abstracts the reality of being human and having the ability to think. Faith negates existence, because ACTION is what a mortal being in any case can be judged. ‘GOD’ exist outside my being and was present in my pre-existence. Looking at the precision in me I have no otherwise but to conclude that he ensured my completeness and tested my functionality to absent self from my daily existence. I have two hands to hold food, two legs to run away from danger or to take me where to find food. He ensured that I have a memory to find my way around and to remember what is edible. Completeness implies that you do not have to engage in daily cries for help but to work- Action.
In addition, I have very few but fundamental disagreements with Bible however it remains one of the best written novels. It is very hard in the African sense, to subscribe to the first five books of the Bible as it relates to the Author, location and the timeline. First, the books were written by Moses the founder of a different religion and whom he was convicted of murder but acclaim that he gave us the first rules? If that is so, then how was he judged of murder. What happen to the 42 negative confessions? Who reduced them to 10? Secondly, if you are an African, the dichotomy puts you in the odds, you are either of the chosen few followers of Moses or of the Egyptian Pharaoh’s- the answer is obvious. Thirdly, In King James Version (KJV), Genesis 4:15 King James Version (KJV) it reads “And the Lord said unto him, therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the Lord set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him”. In the Christians sense this is a statement of fact, However Cain and Abel in my limited knowledge are the first children and yet it indicates that if ‘whoever’ finds him. Who is whoever? It is a good story, it satisfies the absence of ‘time’ as to when we came to be- that is it . At he FIRST COUNCIL OF NICAEA – 325 AD (where the books of the Bible were compiled), there were challenges as to who Jesus was. If God had a son what about us? Or why did he need a son? The treatment of those who hold the dissenting opinions implies that the process was rather political than religious.
I have no otherwise but to go back to the religion of my forefathers. The days when Women would sing Ingo’ and their demands were answered. When Wazee would curse a tree and the leaves would come falling. When they would say Iwee memuny and the outcome was visible to all. The days when they would gather to block a curse upon a family and they would unlock the womb of the barren woman.
Keep your stones at bay, I am just thinking loud!
http://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/03d/0325-1965,_Concilia_Oecumenica,_Documenta_Omnia,_EN.pdf
[1] Nandi God.