Paul McCartney once said, “You can judge a man’s true character by the way he treats his fellow animals.” Taking ‘his fellow’ to imply all animal species, what then is the character of the man who practices Artificial insemination (A.I) in his or her farm? I apologize in advance for I have to step outside my moral zone to address this argument in the language well understood. That there is no ‘artificial’ and there is no ‘Insemination’, A.I simply implies ‘jerking’ a bull to masturbate without consent and later using its seeds to aide a series of sexual assault on unsuspecting Heifers, by touching their muff and forcefully raping them with metals. A.I is one of the many scientific ‘euphemisms’ that intends to Capitalize on animals and their products, with total disregard on their rights to intimacy, consent, and parenting.
How would man respond to this misadventure if ‘she’ becomes the object of the act? That a woman is impregnated through unjust means and carries a baby without knowing the ‘father’? Animals have feelings and they do not wish to carry or rather raise bastards. If all fails and that no consent is obtained at least let the animals be intimate. I spent 9 years of my early life on the farm and I saw animals court and the crested cranes in herding fields dance before getting intimate: THE BEAUTY OF ANIMALIA. However massive advocacy for pedigree cows in the farm has rendered man and his acts less of a superior being and has become a being of lesser mortals motivated by arrogance and greed.
Animals Lives Matter.
Mshamba Abroad 