Scenario: Kesses.
Is man naturally corrupt or that the society makes a man corrupt or that the ‘good’ in one hand makes the man inclined to corruption. Or that the ‘or’ be an ‘and’, such that we can say that the man and the society and the goods are the ingredients of corruptions. If corruption is assumed to be a man’s will to have a good he cannot acquire justly, what happens to all the good people in the society or evil trumps good or all good is corruptible? Can corruption be taught or that it is acquired due to a deficiency?
CASE 1. Is Kenya as a society corrupt or that the ‘man’(individual) in Kenya naturally corrupt or does the ‘Goods’ in ‘Politicians’ hands necessitate the man and the society to be corrupt? If that can be the case, how can the EACC determine who his punishable, since the protocol can be that the one who takes the good unjustly his liable? Or
Could it be that a political jackal is born from a noticeable deficiency in the Good’s ( Unga, mafuta, ksh 50) or that the goods in Political jackal hands make the heart of a ‘man’ inclined to corruption? Or-
CASE 2: Person A, naturally corrupt and that he has found a corrupt society to accommodate his furtherance’s.
Or that person A, his incline to a society he sees a ‘good’ worth corrupting?
Random thoughts.
Mshamba Abroad 