The War on Terror: How we are supposed to feel.

The War on Terror: How we are supposed to feel.

There is a great misconception roaming the air that extremism is a gang of the Middle East and parts of Northern Africa and that Muslims are bad people intending to kill the Western man. We as the ignorant masses are fed daily with this manufactured news from the mainstream media. The intention I will would assume is to make the people feel endangered and therefore blindly support the endless fight against terror. Allow me to stir your thoughts with this question. Suppose your country relies solemnly on export of Oranges to feed its population and it is subjected to an embargo or barn from exporting or importing and in the midst the country’s leadership is destroyed? How will the people survive? How will the energetic youth react? The past has proven this ideal of coercing the people to feel that they are under threat as a mere propaganda of securing public endorsement of a mission to destabilize a nation and exploit its natural resources. Several publications and research have proven that the mask in the name of fighting for social democracy is a fight for regime change. The intention therefore I presume is to install a loyal master willing to trade the lives of the people for oil and other forms of exploitation. This ideal is consistent with evils that plunged the countries of Congo, Sudan Iraq, Libya e.t.c in horrors of dead and civil fights. Be mindful that the denominator is oil and Diamonds.

I do sympathize and empathize with victims of an attack in Paris, West Gate mall, Garissa University and those who were butchered at a museum/coast in Tunisia. I also feel the same for the children, youths and families in Syria, Iraq, Afganistan, Sudan and Somali who have been in years the battle ground for greed and terror. Their dreams of going to school, doing business or becoming doctors have been shuttered by Imperialism and the media does not consider them worth covering. The war on terror can never be won because the critical elements that breed radicalisms are ignored or doctored, no one has ever asked  the ‘WHY’ is one willing to die and for who? Perhaps the people are fed with lies to rubberstamp an unjust course. We can simply conclude that terrorism is a condition that must remain the same or more worst. Gadhafi, Osama and Saddam died and we were told as an ignorant people we will be safe,   here we are again chasing Assad and we all cheering. Sudan is now divided but children are lingering in abject poverty and still they can find guns and ammunitions daily? Why the brown people or Muslims? The greatest people of biblical times, the founders of Medicine and Mathematics? The first people to use the calendar? The people who enjoyed and traded with Africans; a bag of salt for a bag of gold/diamond? There has to be a different way of dealing with this Menace and Professor Noam had suggested a better way to end terrorism; not get involved with it.

It is time for the UN to open up and let the people know the facts surrounding certain articles of the statute that were automatically domesticated by all their signatories? What is the Security Council definition of self-defense and use of aggressive force? Were the people involved in the presence of Western forces in Middle East especially Syria? If there is a cause for aggression, does it achieve intended purpose (peace). We do not want another scenario where people die like pets and the same being blamed on terror acts. Acts of terror are inhuman and the inhumanness should not be used as a form of coercing the council to vote for the use of force. Force has never worked without destroying innocent children, women and elderly.

Personal views and it is subject to criticism.